Skip to main content
Frameworks & standards

Lead vs lag indicator

Lead indicators measure activities that prevent harm (inspections completed, training delivered, near-miss reports closed-out, hazard-register reviews). Lag indicators measure harm after it occurred (TRIFR, LTIFR, days lost). A mature WHSMS uses both, weighted toward lead because lag is reactive.

Legal context

For decades WHS measurement defaulted to lag indicators โ€” TRIFR (Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate), LTIFR (Lost-Time Injury Frequency Rate), MTIFR โ€” but lag indicators only tell you what already happened. Lead indicators measure the precursor activities that prevent harm: percentage of scheduled inspections completed on time, training-matrix gap percentage, near-miss reports per worker per month, time-to-close on corrective actions, percentage of CAPA actions verified-effective, percentage of officers attesting on schedule. ISO 45001 Clause 9.1 (monitoring, measurement, analysis and performance evaluation) anticipates both types, and the Code of Practice on managing psychosocial hazards explicitly calls for lead indicators in psychosocial risk monitoring.

Browse the full glossary.

47 WHS and HSWA terms with legal context, FAQs and regulator references.